Skip to main content

Choosing the Right Database in 2025: A Category-First Guide

 A practical map for faster system-design decisions

Intro

The database landscape has exploded—in a good way. Instead of hunting for a single “best” engine, modern teams compose the right categories for the job: transactional integrity, low-latency reads, high-throughput writes, full-text search, batch analytics, and durable object storage. This post summarizes the trade-space I use in design reviews and includes a one-page visual you can share with your team.

The Category Map (quick reference)

  1. Relational (RDBMS) — Strong consistency, complex queries, auditability.
    Examples: PostgreSQL, MySQL, Aurora (AWS), SQL Server, Oracle.

  2. NoSQL: Key-Value & Wide Column — Massive scale, predictable keys, high write throughput.
    Examples: DynamoDB, Cosmos DB, FoundationDB; Cassandra/ScyllaDB/HBase; Bigtable/InfluxDB/VictoriaMetrics.

  3. Document Stores — Flexible schema, nested JSON, fast iteration.
    Examples: MongoDB, Couchbase, Amazon DocumentDB; Firebase Firestore, Realm; CouchDB/PouchDB; RavenDB/ArangoDB.

  4. Caches & In-Memory — Ultra-low latency, pub/sub, rate-limiting.
    Examples: Redis, Memcached, Azure Cache for Redis, Hazelcast, Apache Ignite, NCache.
  5. Search & Real-Time Analytics — Full-text search, fast aggregations, time-series dashboards.
    Examples: Elasticsearch/OpenSearch, ClickHouse, Apache Druid, Typesense, Meilisearch.

  6. Data Warehouses & Lakes — Petabyte-scale analytics, BI, ELT/ETL, lakehouse.
    Examples: Redshift/BigQuery/Snowflake; Athena/Trino(Presto)/Starburst; Databricks, Delta Lake, Apache Iceberg.

  7. Object Storage (Blob) — Cheap, durable storage for media, logs, ML artifacts, data lakes.
    Examples: Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, Azure Blob Storage; MinIO/Ceph/SeaweedFS; Wasabi/Backblaze B2/Cloudflare R2.

How to Choose Quickly (three prompts)

  1. Access pattern first: keys, reads vs writes, latency, joins/aggregations, query flexibility.

  2. Failure and scale model: single-region vs multi-region, consistency needs, hot keys, TTLs.

  3. Ops reality: managed vs self-hosted, cost model (throughput vs storage vs egress), team skills.

Common, Proven Combos

  1. Low-latency read API: KV (DynamoDB/Cassandra) + Redis cache + object storage for blobs.

  2. Search-heavy product: RDBMS or document for source-of-truth + Elasticsearch/OpenSearch for text + Redis for hot paths.

  3. Analytics stack: Object storage (S3/GCS/Blob) + warehouse/lakehouse (Redshift/BigQuery/Snowflake/Databricks) + Trino/Athena for ad-hoc.

Few Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. One size fits all: forcing a single DB to do everything increases cost and fragility.

  2. Ignoring cache invalidation: fast until stale—then expensive. Design TTL/keys up front.

  3. Unbounded growth: plan TTL/archival to object storage; watch hot partitions and fan-out.

  4. Ops mismatch: great tech, wrong team fit—prefer managed where it accelerates delivery.

Closing
The win in 2025 isn’t a silver bullet database—it’s the ability to compose the right categories for each workload and evolve the stack as needs change. I’ll follow up with short decision flows for specific scenarios.

Which scenario should I tackle first? Comment on LinkedIn.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

14 Essential Software Engineering Concepts for Engineers and Managers

There are many terms and concepts that are important for an engineer to be familiar with, in order to effectively build software. This post includes some of those terms. I will continually add to or update this list. Agile. A flexible and iterative approach to software development that emphasizes collaboration, customer feedback, and adaptive planning. My experience and success with agile development was the inspiration behind starting this blog. DevOps. A set of practices and tools that improve efficiency, speed, and reliability of the product through automation and optimization of the software development and delivery process where operational efficiency is part of the development process. Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery/Deployment (CI/CD). A set of practices and tools that result in faster and more frequent releases, through automation of building, testing, and deployment of software. A key part of CI/CD is to deliver software to production frequently and using tec...
Post a Comment
Read more

Forget Onboarding, do Alongboarding!

Alongboarding, an agile onboarding approach Alongboarding: We’re in it together! Organizations hire new people every day. A great first impression can make a tremendous difference in retaining employees. No one gets a second chance to make a great first impression, not even the best companies. An onboarding experience is an essential part of making that first impression on a new employee. Agile has been around for many years and has gained vast acceptance throughout the community. Yet, I find it disappointing that its tenets are not used well in most companies and most onboarding approaches follow a waterfall approach.  Alongboarding is an agile onboarding approach that applies agile tenets to onboarding new employees and makes the experience richer and more fulfilling. When I joined AppFolio as an agile coach, I experienced this approach during my onboarding. It felt like the team owned my success as much as I owned the team's success. It was a welcome change from some of m...
1 comment
Read more

Make onboarding fun with Onboarding Canvas!

The Onboarding Canvas is a tool that can be used for onboarding a new team member . We derived this tool from Spotify's adaptation of the Toyota Kata . I like this tool because no one can tell you precisely how your onboarding should be like in order for you to be effective at your new job. This is a tool for continuous reflection and adaptation. It puts the newcomer in the driver’s seat, makes the onboarding process agile through continuous collaboration with your team. Four quadrants The onboarding canvas has four quadrants: Now: It defines where the team is now, what is going on and how is the new team member adapting to the change? Definition of awesome: With the addition of the new team member, how would the team like itself to be? What would be awesome for the new team member? Next target: In order to move towards "Definition of awesome" what outcomes should be achieved in the next x weeks? Next steps: What are the immediate next steps for the team...
Post a Comment
Read more